This article explains how and why to use Time in Status within the slices, progress, summary, and breakdown sections, within the Issue Structure, Worklogs/Comments, and Warnings tab types.
To test which Time in Status indicators best fit your projects, try this demo.
Why should you use it?
Time in Status helps you measure how long issues, such as feature requests, incidents, and bugs, remain in the backlog before work starts, and how long they stay in progress afterward.
For example, a low-priority bug may spend one month in the backlog and one day in progress. If a higher-priority bug remains in progress for the same amount of time or longer, you can investigate whether issues are being planned and resolved according to their priority.
You can also compare Time in Status values with estimates to verify if an overrun is likely.
For example, if a bug is estimated to be resolved within one week but remains in progress for longer without worklogs being entered, you can identify a possible overrun before it becomes apparent through logged work.
Where can you use it?
Time in Status measurements are used across most report tab types:
They can appear as fields within columns in the Issue Structure and Worklogs/Comments tab types. They can also be used as values within the Pivot tab type.
In addition, Time in Status measurements can be displayed as indicators in the Progress section or used as slice values across all tab types.
How is Time in Status measured?
Time in Status can be measured in four ways.
Time in To Do: This measurement shows how long an issue remains in the To Do status category, starting from the Created date until the current date and time. The value stops increasing when the issue moves to either In Progress or Done.
In the example above, the issue spent more than three weeks in the To Do status category.
Time in Progress: This measurement shows how long an issue remains in the In Progress status category, starting from the moment it enters that category until the current date and time. The value stops increasing when the issue moves to Done.
In the example above, the issue has spent more than one week in the In Progress status category to date.
Time in Status: This measurement displays a horizontally stacked bar that shows how much time elapsed between each status transition. The total time appears in a tooltip when you hover over or click the bar.
In the example above, the right segment represents Time in To Do, while the left segment represents Time in Progress.
Time in Status Group (not shown): This measurement displays a horizontally stacked bar that shows how much time elapsed within each status category.
Features and use cases
Measure Time in Status for weekly bugs or incidents
You can measure how long bugs or incidents remain in a given status to identify deviations from expected resolution times, especially when filtering by creation date.
For example, you can use this JQL query as a report source to filter issues created in the previous week: created >= startOfWeek("-1w") AND created < startOfWeek()
In the screenshot above, bugs created during that period have not changed status since creation, and no time has been logged.
As a result, the expected one-week resolution time was not met, and some bugs have exceeded the target by one day.
Measure Time in Status Group when using more than 3 status options
Time in Status Group measurement is recommended when a project contains more than three statuses. If you use the Time in Status metric instead, every individual status appears in the stacked bar, which can make it difficult to identify the related status category.
By comparison, the Time in Status Group metric groups statuses by category, making the chart easier to interpret, as shown in the following example.
The screenshot above shows when Time in Status is used as a value within the Pivot Report tab type when a project contains more than three statuses.
Based on the tooltip shown, it may be unclear whether the Ready for Launch and Launched statuses represent issues that are still active or already delivered.
By switching the value from Time in Status to Time in Status Group, as shown in the screenshot below, you can view the status category associated with each status.
This makes it easier to distinguish completed work from active work and improves your ability to measure what is considered Done.
Identify potential overruns while planning future sprints
You can measure how long issues remain in a status to help identify potential overruns while planning future sprints.
For example, in the screenshot above, the sub-task stayed in the In Progress status for more than four weeks after it was created, while only one week of work was logged during that time. This may suggest that some hours were not recorded over several weeks, which could indicate a possible overrun.
You can also enable the Time Budget column to assess whether an overrun is likely or has already occurred.
In the screenshot below, the sub-task is shown as 77% (177% shown), or three days over budget (3d 30m shown), based on the comparison between the original estimate, time spent, and remaining estimate.
FAQ
What happens when an issue is reopened?
If you reopen an issue that was previously marked as Done and change its status to To Do, the value in the Time in To Do column increases until the issue moves to either In Progress or Done.
Similarly, if you change the status to In Progress, the value in the Time in Progress column continues to increase until the issue is marked as Done.
Can more status columns be shown?
No. Columns are limited to the To Do and In Progress status categories to show how long an issue stays in each status.
If this restriction did not exist, all statuses from your Jira environment would be displayed, including statuses from projects that use different workflows. In that case, you could not distinguish between issues that use a particular status and issues from projects where that status does not exist.
For example, a Waiting for Customer status may exist in a project used to track the development of custom features. However, the same status may not exist in an internal project used to track the development of features available across all products.
While there is no separate column for the Done status category, the time elapsed since an issue was resolved is included in the Time in Status group indicator.
Can you change the appearance of Time in Status?
Yes. You can change how the four Time in Status fields appear by using the report sidebar. For example, you can switch between Jira’s default time-tracking format (such as 1w 3d 2h 15m) or display values in hours, days, weeks, or months.
To modify how these fields appear from the report sidebar in Jira:
Click Configure in the header section.
Select General from the dropdown.
Go to the Time units section.
Can you modify the appearance of the Created date field?
Yes. You can change the Complete Date/Time format for the Created date field in Jira by navigating to Jira administration → User Interface → Look and feel.
This allows you to change the display format from dd/MMM/yy h:mm a (for example, 23/May/07 3:55 AM) to dd/MMM/yy (for example, 23/May/07).
Can you detect an overrun before it occurs using Time in Status?
No. For example, if a bug remains in the To Do status and its remaining estimate is unchanged while worklogs continue to be added, an estimate overrun is likely. However, the Time in To Do field will remain empty because the issue has not transitioned to an active status.
We recommend also using the Time Budget progress indicator to determine whether work remains within the estimated budget or has exceeded 100% of it.
This is especially useful when statuses are not updated until work is completed, or when issues are frequently reopened or moved back to a previous status.
How are these measurements different from Issues Lifetime?
Time in Status measurements show how long an issue remained within a specific status or status category during its lifecycle.
By comparison, the Issues Lifetime measurement shows how much time has passed since an issue's Created date and time until the current date and time. The value continues increasing until the issue is moved to Done (Resolved). Any other changes to the issue's status are not measured.
Also, the Issues Lifetime field is not affected by calendars that define working hours or working days, nor by time zone configurations.
In the example above, the Time in Status Group indicator shows that issues spent a combined total of more than 569 weeks in the In Progress status category. This total includes issues that are currently In Progress, issues that have since been completed, and issues that later returned to the To Do category.
By comparison, IssuesLifetime is displayed as a Value in the Summary section of the Pivot tab type. For the In Progress column, it measures the combined lifetime of only those issues that are currently in progress (Unresolved). These issueshave existed for a total of 568 weeks since their creation.
As a result, Time in Status Group and IssuesLifetime measure different aspects of issue activity and should not be expected to produce the same values.
Will changing Time tracking and Board settings day impact Time in Status?
Time tracking settings
Changing the Working days per week or Working hours per day in Jira's Time tracking settings does not affect Time in Status in reports.
A report's working days are determined by the calendar selected within the report and are independent of Jira's Time tracking settings. For example, if a report's calendar is configured to treat Monday through Friday as working days, changing the default value of 5 Working days per week in Jira will not affect the report's calculations.
Similarly, changing the default value of 8 Working hours per day in Jira does not affect Time in Status in reports. Report calendars use their own settings and assume an 8-hour workday.
Board settings
Changing the working days defined in a board's settings does not affect Time in Status in reports, even when those reports use the board as their data source. Time in Status calculations are based on the report's calendar settings rather than the board's working-day configuration.
Can the report calendar impact impact Time in Status?
Yes. The number of working days selected in the report calendar affects Time in Status.
For example, if you deselect Friday in a custom report calendar, Time in To Do and Time in Progress decrease because fewer working days are counted in each week.
Troubleshooting
Can the Created date field and Time in Status fields be impacted by time zones?
The Created and Time in Status fields (such as Time in To Do and Time in Status) displayed in the report use your desktop operating system's time zone. In contrast, the Created field in the Jira issue view uses your Jira account time zone.
For example, a user creates an issue and later moves it to In Progress while working in Jakarta. At that time, the user's desktop time zone is set to Jakarta. Later, the user returns to Montreal and changes the desktop time zone to Montreal, while keeping the Jira account time zone set to Montreal throughout the trip.
As a result, the Created value shown in the report can differ from the Created value shown in the Jira issue view. Because the Time in Status values are calculated from the report's Created value, they can also differ.
If you want the report to display the same values that appeared while the user was in Jakarta, temporarily change the desktop operating system's time zone back to Jakarta.
If you have questions or need assistance, contact our support team via email or service desk. Our team is available Monday through Friday (9:00 AM to 7:00 PM GMT+7) to help with technical challenges or discuss improvements.